The truth is, the early believers had no intention of ever building a “sacred” place to meet. Jews had temples, sacrifices, and priests. When Jesus came it was to end the need for all three. He is the perfect Lamb who was sacrificed so that is why we no longer sacrifice animals. He is our High priest and only mediator between God and man. We no longer need a priest to pray on our behalf. He is the temple (John 2:19-21 says: “Jesus answered them, ‘Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days.’ The Jews replied, ‘It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and you are going to raise it in three days?’ But the temple he had spoken of was his body.”) We do not need a temple, church, cathedral (whatever you want to call it). 2 Corinthians 6:16 says: “What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; just as God said, ‘I will dwell in them and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.’”
Another great passage is Ephesians 2:19-22. Christ is described as the corner stone. His followers are described as a “whole building, being fitted together” and “growing into a holy temple in the Lord, in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling of God in the Spirit.” It is obvious from this passage that God’s intention was for the church to be made of living stones (people) being built into a holy temple (in a spiritual rather than physical sense) where the Spirit dwells. The temple of the Jews was a physical model (a baby step) to symbolize the spiritual temple
God planned all along to create out of people rather than stones. Would we purposely go back to the play dollhouse version when we now have the real thing? It is preposterous. It’s like we took a step forward (in the first century) only to take 2 steps back (with the advent of Constantine). We are in greater bondage to our church buildings now than the Jews ever were to their temple. Is our church any different than their temple? If you act or dress differently in church than you do every day, you are guilty of the same hypocrisy. Do you see the church as a sacred or holy place? Does not scripture say that your body is the temple of the Spirit? You are His holy place. He does not dwell in buildings made by men. When He died on the cross, the curtain of the Holy of holies was ripped by God Himself. He did this to make the point that He no longer dwells there. Would you make His death a joke by continuing to worship in a supposedly “sacred” place that exists only in your delusions? (Sorry, Frank Viola does not speak this way in his book—I’m just becoming exasperated at the pigheaded stubbornness of the imaginary audience in my head).You are probably familiar with the story of Jesus talking with the Samaritan woman at the well. She baited him by trying to start an argument about where to worship. In that day, the Jews worshiped at the temple in Jerusalem while the Samaritans worshiped on the mountain near Jacob’s well. Jesus chose not to take a side. Instead he said, “an hour is coming when neither in this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father. . . But an hour is coming and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for such people the Father seeks to be His worshipers. God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.” (John 4:21, 23-24)
Don’t you see from this passage that it is God’s ideal that we worship Him in spirit and reality rather than in a place (which was symbolic rather than real)? We now have the freedom to worship Him anywhere at anytime because His Spirit dwells in us. Why do we shackle His Spirit to Sunday morning inside a building? No wonder we can’t see or hear Him. We have pinned Him to a time and place like a butterfly in a velvet case. Please let the Spirit out of the box so He can fly.


3 comments:
The path to the truth is a perilous journey fraught with disbelief. "Going to church" as a building is so ingrained within our cultural that it will take a major cultural shift to embrace the truth. Thank you Mary for sharing the revelation of what "Going to church" actually means.
I'm curious as to your take on Adam and Eve and WHY she did the deed.
Joanne,
If you were joking about Eve then :-). If you were serious, then I'm not taking the bait. You know how I feel about that soapbox. I can show you how to set up your own blog where you can speculate on Eve's motivations. As my sister in Christ, all I have to say now is that I agree to disagree with you because it is a non-essential. ;-)
Mary, you are quite correct that making a building "holy" is false and has ties closer to paganism than biblical truth. However, to take that position does not also require one to negate the idea of meeting in a building.
In Acts, the believers met at the Temple, in synagogues, homes, or wherever they could. In the most early days of the church, surviving poverty and staying alive took priority over the kind of building.
I would like you to consider a verse.
1 Timothy 3:14-16
14 These things I write to you, though I hope to come to you shortly; 15 but if I am delayed, I write so that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.
Here Paul is instructing Timothy (and others) to behave in the house of God. The context of the whole letter is church order. Paul saw no problem with calling a meeting place "the house of God" as the building did contain God's people, the church.
So a building isn't the church, but it does contain the church when believers meet.
Post a Comment